I happened upon Royan Lee's blog during the weekend and was moved by his perspective on extra curriculars. I especially liked his list of extra curricular benefits to students and how it motivates them:
Correct me if I am wrong, but ECs seem to be beloved for the following reasons:
- Students and teachers can pursue personal passions.
- They tend to be growth-oriented.
- They are often project-based.
- Collaboration is valued highly.
- Losses and failure are celebrated as learning opportunities.
- There are often concrete goals to pursue.
- They tend to include mixed age/grade groups.
- There is much more movement, less sedentary work.
- Paper-pen tasks are rarely seen.
- There is very little rote memorization.
- The process is seen as more important than the destination.
- There are no standardized, high stakes evaluations.
- No one gets graded.
- Assessment is feedback and improvement based.
- The development of mastery is understood to be a long process.
- Students and teachers have autonomy for the direction of the activity.
So is this a conversation about our beloved ECs or a discussion about what’s missing from learning in curriculum proper?
Follow the link to read more and follow the discussion that ensues.
What's so special about extra-curricular activities?
0 comments:
Post a Comment